Independence Day 2009

Today remembers a day when Americans declared their independence in order to form, eventually, a more perfect union -- because they believed that independence grants us all certain unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

When it comes down to it, that's all anyone ever really needs.

May you find your yours.

As for me, I'll be going to Marathon for the second time - the first being when this picture was taken, back in January.

Reactions: 


If writing was a horse, I never would ride.

Great, great post. Something that 140 characters just couldn't have said. Maybe you can still write, after all.

This was the start of my response which initially started as a comment to my friend in Boston, rooroo, on her post titled "on writing." Go read it. Then, if you care to, read the rest of what became my comment.

I've often felt exactly the way she feels. As an elementary schooler, I wrote masses and masses of creative fiction -- horse stories, mainly, but I occasionally dabbled in ten-page intros to random fictional stories about weathermen, gymnasts and all sorts of things I was way under qualified (at age nine) to be writing about. At eleven, I wrote something that is still my favorite fiction I've ever written, centering around a Nassau Beach (nevermind the fact that I've never been there) seagull named Fredwick (I didn't know it was spelled Frederick).

I wrote, left-handed, sitting on my twin bed blanketed with sheets of notebook paper, using whatever pen I could find on my bedside table. My mom used to refer to me as her "ink stained wretch," the sole of my left hand always smeared with evidence of my afternoon hobby. I cataloged my writing in baskets and boxes, the curly fringe from my notebooks littering my bedroom floor. I loved to write and it was never difficult to do so. Physically, mentally and creatively, I was at my writing peak with Full House, Black Beauty and Trumpet of the Swans as my muse.

The change happened when I was tasked with writing an analysis of an excerpt from Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech. It was required for entry into my new middle school's honors "Language Arts" class. I remember staring at the question and thinking "This isn't asking me to write anything." Where was the standardized test question on how to cook a spaghetti dinner on the moon? Where was the prompt of a dragon holding a toaster that I had been weaned on in elementary school? Analysis, I decided then, isn't writing. As I read the speech, I imagined the look of the crowd, maybe a boy on his father's shoulders, and a story that could be told from his eyes about the movement. Or a basset hound who heard the speech and went on to befriend an orange tabby cat. Wild thoughts crashed together in my mind -- later I would call it my "imagination." But I pushed those tangents aside and struggled through my first analysis.

I remember getting my schedule for middle school classes on Back to School Day. There it was: Language Arts - R. We wondered what the "R" meant -- my sister pointed out that hers had an "H" next to it, clearly Honors. My mom marched my schedule over to a counselor, who explained that "R" meant "Regular." At that point, it might have well said "Remedial." I was embarrassed and ashamed -- me, the family writer, the ink stained wretch, hadn't made the grade. My analysis wasn't up to par.

I don't remember writing much of anything in middle school, creative or otherwise. But boy did I write in high school. AP essay after AP essay, I became an analysis machine. My handwriting looked like Arial Narrow 11-point font and I used roller-ball pens to keep my hands clean. I wrote on college-ruled paper because I liked how it made me write smaller, and I knew how many words I could fit on one side of the page. I still have everything I ever wrote in high school, all filed according to semester and teacher. One particular coup, when I was taking junior and senior English concurrently, was a piece entitled "Their Eyes Were Watching Gatsby," tying themes from The Great Gatsby, which I was analyzing for my junior class, to Their Eyes Were Watching God, my senior assignment.

Those pieces are some of the best analysis I'll ever write. They're probably also the most useless.

With the exception of this blog, whose only purpose is as my own one-woman reality show, I never write for fun anymore. I don't even think I have paper in my desk at home. The last time I tried to write, my hand got tired after the third sentence. Where was my keyboard? I couldn't remember how to spell "suppose" and there was no red squiggly line to help me out. But, most troubling, I couldn't think of a single story to tell. I could come up with an engaging introductory sentence, some ironic themes, and even a few metaphors. What then? Where did my imagination go?

We lose our hobbies, I think, when we get too good at them. Too trained and groomed and prodded, they become caricatures of what they were, Jon Benet-style faces that are scarily perfect. I used to have twenty six t-shirts with horses on them and seventy two plastic horses. Then, one day, I was able to name you every bone in the lower half of a horse's leg, point out the exact angle in the hoof that causes a horse to founder, and explain how they die because evolution never taught them to vomit. Wispy manes and velvet muzzles gave way to back injuries and frustrations. Somewhere went both writing and horses, and so I went: a horse-crazy, ink-stained wretch turned occasional blogger, a stiff spine and a critical eye, always looking for a limp or a lump.
Reactions: 


A face for blogging

Some of you often wonder what it is I do all day. In fact, many people at first think I make my living blogging. Which is so not the case for Mean Rachel -- she is merely an insane diversion that I'm starting to grow out of. But, in a way, I do make a living blogging (among other things). Just not on this one -- on this one.

Below is my recent appearance as The Girl in a Bright Blue Shirt #1 on KXAN News.



Moving? Don't forget the pets

AUSTIN (KXAN) - Evonna Patanella and her daughter have a big move ahead of them.

"We're moving to Singapore," said Patanella. "It's not like moving in the U.S. where you can load up a truck and drive and get there."

Besides moving the furniture, there are two things that can't be left behind- Abby and Tessa, the family dogs.

Yet, getting the pets to Singapore is a complicated process. From health documents to having them quarantined, it can be confusing.

Luckily, an Austin company is helping them out.

"We do door-to-door logistics, pick up at the residence, deliver to airport, all the flight bookings and then pack up and deliver on the receiving end," said Rachel Farris, with Pet Relocation.

And since Pet Relocation started the service, it has moved some interesting animals.

"We've moved frogs from Switzerland, 14 horses to Honduras," said Farris.

Even a Siamese fighting fish was moved to Amsterdam.

"We had an employee that worked for Starbucks and she had a fish named Franchesco," said Farris. "She always called him her significant other. It was her dearly beloved fish."

The fish was so loved that she paid $2,500 to move it.

To get overseas, Pet Relocation recommends using Continental or KLM.

"We only use airlines that have staff set up to watch the pets to make sure they are staying healthy, staying hydrated and they are going to arrive safe," said Farris.

While it's hard to make beloved pets travel thousands of miles, it is nice to know someone is making sure they get there safely. Pet relocation services start around $1,000.

Reactions: 


Brad Womack Didn't Buy Mother Eagan's

West Sixth Street is seeing more changes lately than funeral homes are seeing celebrities (what, too soon?). This weekend marked the end of the Star Bar, much to the chagrin of political consultants and lobbyists across Texas, as the bar undergoes a much-needed renovation for approximately five months (read: one year), at which point it will reopen under new management. A sendoff at Star Bar on Friday night found the bar so packed, noisy and hot that no one will want to go there for a year or more anyway. Side note: I always thought SB smelled like my grandmother's house which, apparently, always smelled like a gin and tonic.

Today, Michael Barnes at the Statesman's Out and About reported that Brad, Chad and Wes Womack 'bought' Mother Eagan's. However, according to an email from Brad Womack, they have not bought Mother Eagan's - they've acquired the lease, which is up in May 2010. ME will continue to operate until then as it does now, so trivia fans can breathe a sigh of relief for now.

As a former ME Tuesday Trivia regular, and a one-time Thursday Bingo champion, I'm interested to see what sort of overhaul the Womack brothers have planned for the joint. Womack reports "As far as trivia, if it's going to still be a pub, etc., I simply can't tell you that because we honestly don't know." Now we know what Deanna felt like. Will they? Won't they? In the meantime, I also have some name suggestions for the new enterprise. 'Cause clearly I know more about bar management than they do.

The Final Rose - This '07 throwback might step on the toes of ABC, but think of all the Jenni's and Jennie's and Jenny's who would stop by! I'm thinking hot tubs, champagne and Deal or No Deal-style cocktail waitresses, with a red-carpet entrance littered with rose petals and tears.

The Wynn - Named in honor of our former Mayor and Mother Eagan's regular, the Vegas-loving trio (plus their "brother from another mother" Jason Carrier) could start a little Strip of their own. It seems only appropriate that with the departure of Mayor Will Wynn from City Council, so too goes Mother Eagan's.

Womacks - Classic and sounds like a cold beer. A bit self-aggrandizing, but hey, so was going on The Bachelor.

The Mark - Just to show that, west of Colorado, they do in fact know how to spell it.

Brad, Chad & Wes Womack's Ivory Kitten - Why not soak up some of the runoff from Kenny Luna's Ivory Cat closing? Sure, Marc Katz's failed "Meow" piano hovel wasn't a hit, but that place is too small and smells like pickles. West Sixth needs a rocking piano bar. Anyone? Anyone?

Leave your suggestions in the comments section, or on a napkin with your phone number at the bar.
Reactions: 


Texas Progressive Alliance Weekly Round Up

It's Fourth of July week, and so it's time for an extra-patriotic rendition of the Texas Progressive Alliance blog roundup. Ed Note: I was a slacker and didn't get a chance to submit anything to the roundup.

Off the Kuff takes a look at the latest Lyceum poll on the Governor and Senate races in Texas. (Ed. Note: Had a very nice conversation with Kuffner over drinks at the Belmont last week! Thanks for meeting up with us!)

Neil at Texas Liberal suggests that instead of blowing of your fingers lighting fireworks--during a drought in Harris County no less---that maybe you would be better off reading a book instead.

With 2010 spinning up, it's funny to watch all the different players already on the field line up to take their first hits. McBlogger, of course, thinks they're all deeply in need of a little advice which he graciously provides (with surprisingly sparse use of profanity)!

WCNews & Dembones at Eye On Williamson post on the latest controversy involving the Williamson County Commissioners Court, Budget officer not just a good idea, it's the law.

John at Bay Area Houston says Turn out the lights, the family values party is over.

CouldBeTrue of South Texas Chisme thinks online Texas Republican commentary on Mark Sanford is interesting.

The similarities between Mark Sanford and Ray Bolger (as the Scarecrow in "The Wizard of Oz") are just too weird, notes PDidde at Brains and Eggs.

The wise men are willing to pay a tax on their favorite junk food to pay for health care reform.

WhosPlayin.com Video bring you EXTREME Congressional Town Hall - Special "Losing our freedoms" edition, sponsored by Prozac.

Over at TexasKaos, Libby Shaw calls our attention to Confessions of a Former Health Insurance Exec: "We Dump the Sick". Who knew? All the posturing , hypocritical , offers of self-reform and insurance relief are just so much bogus cover up for an industry too greedy to ever be trusted to regulate themselves!

The Texas Cloverleaf discusses gay pride, bar raids, and millions of gays marching in DFW this past weekend during the 40th anniversary of Stonewall.

Burnt Orange Report covers TX-10 Congressional candidate Jack McDonald's campaign expansion in the Austin area.
Reactions: 


Weak Democratic Primary Round Up

It's sadly typical of Democrats that, in an election that could be won by highlighting the failures of the Republican leadership, we can't seem to dredge up a leader of our own.

There's been some fall-out this week from Sen. Leticia Van de Putte deciding not to run for Governor. After the initial support she garnered on many sites (including my own), her decision to hand the baton over to someone else has taken the air out of some Democrats hoping for options beyond Schieffer and Kinky. Most bloggers are still wary of Tom Schieffer, while either completely ignoring or being frustrated by Kinky Friedman and Mark Thompson.

Everyone's favorite kid blogger on a bike, Karl Thomas Musselman, had some strong words on the state of the Governor's Race on BOR.
It's unsettling when the only emotions I feel of any kind in the Governor's race are negative, and directed towards Kinky Friedman.
Phillip Martin, who appears to be headed back to Texas to get in on the 2010 fun, also seemed disappointed on BOR, writing Some Quick Notes on Tom Schieffer:
It seems that Democrats can take Schieffer as a candidate or shove it.
Marc Campos, of Campos Communications, wants to know who will excite the base:
Senator Van de Putte says that Schieffer isn’t exciting the Dem base. Can Sen. Watson excite the base?

As long as the frontline of Lone Star statewide Dems candidates is made up of Anglo fellas, I don’t see a scenario where the Dem base gets revved up – sorry – no se puede.
McBlogger describes his frustrations with the Democratic primary runners as only he can (and as the mainstream media cannot):
Texas Democrats deserve a whole lot better and so do the down ballot candidates. It's time for those who choose to run (don't act like you're doing us a goddamn favor) to straighten the fuck up and run like real people who are serious about doing a good job for their fellow Texans.
Judith Ford, of Castle Hills Democrats, attended a Denton County fish fry that Schieffer spoke at and got the crowd's feedback on him:
[T]he Dems in the crowd are wary of Tom Schieffer, who gives off a George W. Bush smell. That may be one "friendship" that served Tom well in the 90's and 2000's, but comes back to haunt him in a big, not-so-good way.
Greg Wythe, of Greg's Opinion, referred to Schieffer as "Captain Gloomy."
...[O]ne should really refrain from references to "road to disaster" before launching a statewide roadshow announcing your campaign for public office.
In perhaps a more nuanced way, Charles Kuffner also thinks Schieffer should accentuate the positive:
My advice, for what it's worth, is that it would probably be best for Schieffer to focus more on the things we can and will achieve with him than on the things we can't.
South Texas Chisme seemed more than a little agitated by Schieffer's friendship with George W. Bush:
Tom Schieffer explains his vote for George Bush. Oh, wait. NOTHING can adequately explain votes for George Bush. Seriously. If he had a single brain cell, he would have known better than to vote for him.
It's worth noting that Eye On Williamson took a more moderate approach to Schieffer announcing his run for Governor:
Democrats should be willing to give Schieffer a chance and as he said, “There’s a long time between now and March."
But even the mainstream media seemed skeptical this week, further emphasizing the problems that occur when a Democratic base rejects its available options (Kerry '04, anyone?).

Paul Burka asks "Can Kirk Watson win?" while touching on a much broader recurring theme and important question -- can any Democrat?

Q. Is the party infrastructure capable of sustaining a major statewide campaign?

A. The potential exists, but there are too many fiefdoms: the Lone Star Project, the state House and Senate Democratic caucuses, Austin trial lawyers, Houston trial lawyers, labor, and the party itself. “You can’t send out a press release without six people wanting to rewrite it,” a senior Democratic strategist told me. The party should provide the message.
Even the Statesman's Gardner Selby pointed out five ways Schieffer could epically fail (only five?):
To solidify standing as the front-runner for his party’s nomination, however, he needs to make inroads with activists who jumped into passing leaflets and nudging neighbors during last year’s not-going-to-happen-ever-again Democratic presidential primary; it’s those troops (thousands of them) who are both eager and wizened enough to want to get involved afresh—for the right candidate. But I suspect it’ll take a cutting-edge crew of them to get others signed on with Schieffer.
There is, indeed, a long time between now and March.


Reactions: 


An Open Letter to Ambassador Schieffer

From SanAntonio Express-News:
“And also remind people that this is not going to be easy. It's going to be really hard. And if they want to do that, I get to be governor. And if they don't want ot [sic] do that, I can go make money, and I've done my civic duty of trying to lay it out.”

Dear Ambassador Schieffer,

You "get" to be a Lottery Winner. You "get" to be prom king. You might even "get" to be an Ambassador.
But no one, perhaps with the exception of Rick '39%' Perry, "gets" to be Governor of Texas.
No, that's something you've gotta earn.

Enjoy making money,
MR
Reactions: